In Defense of Return of Kings

Last week, the internet was set ablaze by a blog post. A simple writing. A mere expression of one’s thoughts. Return of Kings dared to post a satirical piece called 5 Reasons to Date a Girl with an Eating Disorder. As you can ascertain from the title, women everywhere rose up and tangled their panties into a collective bunch so big, it could strangle the stay puft marshmallow man. Sadly, white knights rode in shortly thereafter on their trusty steeds, swearing vengeance for their coveted women, secretly hoping they’d get a glimpse of a side-boob for their internet martyrdom.

RoK and Tuthmosis received death threats on twitter. No less than 5 Change.org petitions were started to remove the page. Tweet after tweet, page after page, RoK was assailed in every way imaginable. Viral was an understatement for that piece.

Now, Supreme Men know that I will defend RoK’s position as equally ferociously as a white knight trying to chase that hamster. Sit back as I take these feminists and their white knight supporters to school.

Under the United States Constitution, the First Amendment guarantees RoK’s right to free speech. This Amendment has been tested in Court after Court. And has been extended all the way to corporations. Free speech is an inalienable right in the U.S. Despite the NSA and FBI’s best efforts, we the people will not be silenced. Political speech, commercial speech, school speech, and obscenity, are all protected forms of speech. Motherfucking money has been ruled to be a form of speech. That’s why politicians get fat off campaign contributions.

Satire and parody are protected. Period. RoK can write whatever the fuck they want. And so can I. The First Amendment guarantees it. You can’t even sue a motherfucker for defamation unless you have proof that a falsehood was published, not just a mere opinion. Guess what else the First Amendment guarantees? Freedom of the fucking press. The same press that has carried this RoK story to the ends of the internet.

Now as for the article itself, was it really that bad? It was clearly a satire piece. But most women cannot climb through their ignorance to recognize that. The article simply gives 5 compelling reasons why men should consider dating a girl with an eating disorder. Fuck, an argument can be made that the article actually helps their cause because it encourages men to date them, thus giving those women some much needed support. Whatever the case, the article does not cause epic upheaval in a society and women should not be responding as violently as extremists when their Prophet is depicted in a cartoon. The First Amendment is our protection against tyranny. And it is the women and white knights here who are being tyrannical by demanding clear free speech be stifled.

You know who got lit up by our Courts under the First Amendment? They guy who screamed fire in a crowded theater. That motherfucker had no right to free speech because he was going to kill everyone through mass panic. That is the level of shit you need to do to be not protected by the First Amendment. Not write an article that sends hamsters into spin mode.

You know who weathered this kind of storm in the past? Hugh Hefner. Motherfuckers have been trying to stifle free speech for over 100 years. And Hugh Hefner was public enemy No. 1. On June 4, 1963, Hugh Hefner was arrested for “publishing and distributing an obscene magazine.” Hugh Hefner took the stand in his own defense. And fucking won. The jury deadlocked. Mistrial. But yet you white knight sissies jerk off to porn without even understanding how porn exists in this nation. Playboy pioneered that shit you get off to. Bitches made careers in modeling, acting, fashion, etc., all because of Hugh fucking Hefner.

Do you dumb whores know what you’re even asking for? Yes I called you whores. You want to take down a page of the internet simply because you disagree with it? Are you that fucking uneducated or ignorant? Imagine if tomorrow someone disagreed with what you wrote on your lame facebook status page. Better yet, imagine that the U.S. Government has taken away your internet, and you stand outside in protest. You want the U.S. Government to be able to stifle your freedom to protest? It is a slippery slope that you will tumble down headfirst.

And you white knights. You motherfuckers. No matter how violently you defend her on the internet, rest assured that a man from RoK or The Male Supremacy will cum down her throat, not you. You defend her because you know not the evil that resides within her. She desires to burn the Constitution and you support her blindly. Men like those at RoK are doing you a great service by flushing these women out into the open so you can see their true form. And this is how you repay them? I sincerely hope you white knights one day see the world as it truly is. Until then, fuck you for not paying homage to all of the people that bled relentlessly before you to give you the freedom to cry on the internet.

Reign Supreme RoK.

Master’s Law of Supremacy: Women are Objects of our Desires

“Women have always been sex objects, and that’s nothing new. They always will be.”  ~ Cher

Somehow, in our emasculated society, men have been brainwashed into accepting that women are not to be objectified. Think about that for a second. Women are not sex objects. That is a woman’s position. And that is society’s position in the past century or so. Does that notion not conflict in your man brain somewhere? Does not your evolved brain skip like a CD when you hear that? Is there not a glitch for a split second? A moment of hesitation, as though thousands of years of evolution are being suppressed inside of you?

Men, if you dare answer no, then you’re either lying or brainwashed. You know for a fact that there was a moment in your life where girls suddenly became attractive. You were in fourth or fifth grade. Maybe later. But out of nowhere, some girl caught your eye. And looking back, what was it about her? What exactly made you notice her? You were like 10 for fuck’s sake. You can’t say it was her intelligence. Or the way she did math on the chalkboard. Oh you loved the way she read out loud in class? It was her fucking looks. You had a boner just looking at her. And throughout your life, you look at images of beautiful women and lust after them. You see a hot girl in the street and can’t help but catch a glimpse. Men routinely are caught by their women doing what? Checking out other women.

Funny thing about women. They will never admit it, but women themselves objectify other women. We men look at women in hopes of mating. Women glare at other women to size up their competition. In an article published in Psychological Science magazine, researchers actually confirmed that. Yes, there is scientific proof to lend credence to the notion that women are inherently sex objects. Women are perceived as sex objects around the world. And women objectify other women. Those screaming against such objectification are reaching the height of hypocrisy.

Then there are the the hamsters that claim objectification goes beyond the sexual. That objectification is also status based. That because books and cartoons and shit have male leading roles, that somehow women are objectified, their feelings overlooked. Just writing that sentence made me feel like a bitch. Excuse me while I do some pushups. What a load of ridiculous nonsense. This is your problem as a woman? Being left out of a fucking leading role? A man makes Lara Craft as the leading character in a video game, and your problem is that he said something you didn’t like? Why don’t you try joining the 1 in 15 men in the U.S. that face attempted rape in jail everyday?  Why don’t you discuss how the laws have been crafted to favor you in every possible scenario? Why don’t you address the fact that a man can have oral sex with you, but later be subject to a court order to pay child support because you sperm-jacked him? Why don’t you discuss how many women are actually self-made in this world vs inheriting their money or getting rich through divorce? While men in every corner of this earth provide for themselves and their families by any means necessary? That, my little feminist troll, is true objectification. I can sling bullshit statistics at you everyday, but reality is all around you. Next time some burglars smash their way into your house, you women should ask yourself who you want by your side. Your feminist comrade? Or a man with the balls to repel the attack?

Now, there is a distinct difference between a woman being the object of our desires, and that being her worth to us. She may be a sex object. But that does not mean she is worthy of us, nor does it amount to the full value of her worth to us. Women completely fail to understand that. Feminists have automatically linked the two together, simply because the fat, ugly ones hate not getting the attention. So they scream all kinds of nonsense propaganda to make hot girls hate themselves for being hot. Even this study’s lead author, a woman, claimed that objectification has “direct negative consequences” such as eating disorders and a”negative sense of self.” She gives no support for those statements. The media and advertising are always in a feminist’s cross-hairs because they think putting clothes on a skinny model is wrong. Bitch if you’re fat or old, then don’t get mad at your fellow woman who isn’t. Just because I looked a hot girl, she automatically has low self esteem? How the fuck do you make that leap? Bitches do not fight fair.

In reality, objectification has led us men to propagate the species. The very women that complain about being sex objects conveniently forget that thousands of years of evolution brought us here. Her father fucked her mother because he was sexually attracted to her. What the fuck is wrong with that? It is completely natural. We are creatures of nature. And we have in our brains a certain evolutionary mechanism which attracts us to women by their physical appeal. That is why there are 7 Billion fucking people in this world.

Furthermore, women are absolute contributors towards the objection they so vehemently complain about. Facebook is an attention-whore’s playground. It’s Instagram and Twitter all motherfucking day. Just look at the daily status updates for hot girls. They’re littered with “selfies” where they claim to be ugly, fishing for compliments in a  sea full of kamikaze trout. You men personally know dozens of women that put up scantily clad pictures of themselves, then claim that guys are creepy. And some of these brauds have boyfriends. But they cannot get enough attention.

Then, women have the audacity to put on a tight mini-skirt to go grocery shopping, then act appalled because guys kept looking at them. What the fuck? If you dress with your tits hanging out, what do you think is going to happen? We men are naturally inclined to look at your body. It’s like a fucking magnet to us. We want that body first and foremost. How can a woman claim that she shouldn’t be “objectified” when she’s out looking like a hooker. You wore that outfit to get attention. Either you’re an attention-whore, or you’re a real whore. Those are your two options.

The key point to be extracted from all of the feminist noise is that women are naturally the object our desires. We Supreme Men should not be ashamed of that, nor should we be shamed by women of that. I have no problem letting it be known that I as a man find women attractive. And I will fucking look a scantily-clad bitch dead in the eyes until she breaks eye contact. Simply because I can. But can she hold my attention after meeting her? That is a completely different game.

Related articles

• A Biological Standpoint For Objectifying Women (thongexcavationpoetry.wordpress.com)
• Portrait of the female as an sex object (pandorapavlides.wordpress.com)
• The Objectification of Women – It Goes Much Further Than Sexy Pictures (femborg.wordpress.com)